The process of producing silage involves harvesting a fresh forage
crop at a near neutral pH from the field, putting that crop into
an enclosed storage system of some sort (e.g. bales, bags,
bunkers, pits, piles, towers, etc.) and acidifying the material to
reduce its pH which prevents the growth of spoilage organisms.
Acidification is achieved, either in part or in total, by the
production of organic acids from microbial fermentation within the
ensilage (the ensiled material). Microbes, or bacteria, either
naturally-occurring in the crop or applied as an inoculant,
convert fermentable substrates, predominantly sugars, into organic
acids that reduce the pH and effectively pickle the crop,
producing acidified silage.
The most important acid produced, in
terms of rapidly decreasing the pH, is lactic acid, though it is
also advantageous to have some acetic and propionic acids
produced, to achieve good stability of the material at feedout and
to prevent heating and mold growth. The bacteria that produce
lactic acid in ensiled materials are facultative anaerobes, i.e.
they can grow aerobically (with oxygen) and anaerobically (without
oxygen), but produce lactic acid most efficiently in anaerobic
conditions. Thus to reduce the pH as quickly as possible, to
minimize nutrient losses and the potential for the fermentation to
be overtaken by clostridia, it is important that the ensilage
become anaerobic as quickly as possible. Oxygen is the enemy,
both in terms of achieving the desired fast initial fermentation
to preserve the forage and for preventing spoilage after opening.
The Importance of Packing Density
The process of harvesting fresh forage
and placing into storage structures tends to aerate the forage
(enabling oxygen to permeate the ensilage). Rapid removal or
displacement of this entrained oxygen is critical to achieve fast
fermentation required to maintain quality in the resultant
silage. Left just in a loose, covered pile, the oxygen would
ultimately be utilized by the mixed microbial population in the
forage at harvest, producing a rather smelly pile of composted
material that would most likely turn clostridial once all the
oxygen had been eliminated. To ensure that good preserving
fermentation is achieved and to minimize nutrient and dry matter
losses, it is important to displace as much oxygen out of the
ensilage mass as possible, by packing the material thoroughly and
effectively. The effect of packing density on dry matter losses
in silage is shown in Table 1.
|
Table
1 The Effect of Packing Density on Dry Matter Losses in
Corn Silage after 180 Days Ensiling |
|
Silage Density
(lb
DM/ft3) |
Dry
Matter Loss
(%) |
|
10 |
20.2 |
|
14 |
16.8 |
|
15 |
15.9 |
|
16 |
15.1 |
|
18 |
13.4 |
|
20 |
10.0 |
|
Source: Ruppel, 1992 |
In addition, Lynch and Kung (2000)
showed that decreasing packing density resulted in a slower
ensiling fermentation (Figure 1), which in turn influenced the
level of yeasts in the silage at opening (>100 CFU yeasts/g in the
more tightly packed silage compared to 100,000 CFU yeasts/g in the
more loosely packed silage).

Managing Packing Density
The packing density achieved is a
result of a number of factors, many of which can be controlled by
the producer. In a survey of 168 bunker silos in Wisconsin,
Holmes and Muck (1999) found packing densities ranging from below
7 to just over 27 lb DM/ft3 and Visser (2007) reported
a wide range of packing densities for corn silages and haylages in
various structures from a survey that covered 177 storage units
across Minnesota and Wisconsin (Table 2). Thus, it is clearly
important to understand and manage the factors that can improve
packing density.
|
Table
2 Results of Silage Density Tests for Haylages and Corn
Silages |
|
|
Haylage |
Corn
Silage |
|
Storage Unit |
Number of Units Tested |
Range
of Packing Densities (lb DM/ft3) |
Number of Units Tested |
Range
of Packing Densities (lb DM/ft3) |
|
Bunker |
31 |
9.9 –
27.2 |
37 |
6.4 –
23.6 |
|
Pile |
14 |
8.2 –
22.9 |
21 |
4.9 –
18.7 |
|
Bunker/pile |
3 |
14.7 –
36.3 |
11 |
4.9 –
18.6 |
|
12 ft
bag |
1 |
9.5 –
11.8 |
3 |
3.2 –
12.5 |
|
10 ft
bag |
14 |
3.4 –
24.8 |
10 |
5.7 –
13.5 |
|
9 ft bag |
15 |
4.3 –
27.2 |
15 |
2.4 –
13.9 |
|
8 ft bag |
1 |
8.3 –
15.9 |
1 |
5.7 –
10.5 |
|
Source:
Visser, 2007 |
The interrelationship between a number
of the controllable management factors and the expected packing
density can be explored using an excellent planning tool available
on the University of Wisconsin Web site (www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/uwforage/storage.htm).
This link provides a “live” spreadsheet where the planned or
actual values can be input by the producer or advisor and the
resultant expected packing density will be automatically
calculated. By changing values in the spreadsheet, one can also
see how adding weight to packing tractors, changing the delivery
rate of the forage to the pit, etc., influences the final density
achieved. Producers are encouraged to go this Web site and juggle
factors to discover the importance layer thickness plays in the
whole ensiling process.
Factors that can be
managed to achieve higher packing densities, which minimize
nutrient and dry matter losses and enhance stability at feedout
include:
-
Forage maturity/dry matter –
Wetter forage compacts more easily, but can be prone to seepage
and more likely to suffer a butyric fermentation (especially
haylages). Drier forage is more difficult to pack and keep
compacted and is more likely to have higher levels of yeasts and
molds (increased risk of instability at feedout).
-
Chop length and processing –
Smaller particle size facilitates compaction, but needs to be
balanced against feeding objectives.
-
Storage structure – In
towers, gravity will take care of compaction of the material
lower down in the tower, while the upper lays will not be
adequately packed. From previously given data, it is evident
that good management of bagging machines is essential!
-
Forage delivery rate – This
needs to be matched against optimum packing time/number of
tractors (see below) since it is often not practical to control
delivery rate (especially if forage is harvested by a custom
chopper).
-
Packing tractor weight – The
estimated amount of packing weight required can be calculated by
multiplying the estimated tons of crop delivered to the silo in
an hour by 800. Weights can be added directly to the front of
the tractor or the three-point hitch or by filling tires with
water.
-
Adding packing tractors –
Optimally packing time should be one to three minutes per ton of
forage (fresh weight). It may take more than one packing
tractor to achieve this without impacting the forage delivery
rate.
-
Packing layer depth – Thinner
is better and the old rule-of-thumb of six inches as a maximum
should really be applied.
-
Silo height – Greater height
increases silage density in the lower layers, but for piles and
bunkers this can lead to upper layers being less well packed and
can cause significant safety issues, both while filling and at
feedout.
Bottom line
Achieving good packing density
(minimum 15 lb DM/ft3) is essential for making
good-quality silage. While the old mantra “pack, pack and pack
some more” is a good rule-of-thumb, there are tools available to
help producers plan and monitor the packing operation to achieve
the best packing density. Putting those tools to work may have a
positive effect on your bottom line.
Measuring Silage Density
The surveys mentioned in the companion
article “Silage Packing Density” (Holmes and Muck, 1999; Visser,
2007) reviewed measurement of packing density in bunkers, piles,
and bags post-ensiling.
Determining Dry Matter Packing
Density:
These measurements are obtained using
a commercially available silage density corer, essentially an
18-24" piece of 2" stainless steel pipe with a sharpened cutting
edge at one end. Using a suitable gas or high power electric
drill, the corer can be driven into the silage at various points
across the face to measure packing density at different heights,
in the center, at the edges, etc. The depth of the hole left
following the coring is recorded and the sample weighed. To
obtain dry matter (DM) packing density, the dry matter content of
the sample needs to be measured, using a microwave oven or a
Koster tester. The packing densities can then be calculated:
1)
Fresh Weight Density:
Weight of sample (g)
¸
454 (conversion to lb) A
Depth of core (in.)
¸
12 (conversion to feet) B
Fresh weight density in
lb/ft3 = A x (0.0191 x B)
2)
Dry weight density:
Dry matter (%)
¸
100 C
Dry weight density =
fresh weight density x C
Dry Matter
Packing Density Determination During Filling:
It is also possible to monitor packing
density during filling, as part of the overall management
program. This is done by digging down into the silage using an
auger or corer and carefully collecting forage for weighing. Once
weighed, a sample can then be taken for dry matter measurement. A
suitable plastic bag is then placed open into the hole and filled
with water to the level of the silage surface. The bag plus water
is then weighed. The packing densities can then be calculated:
1)
Fresh Weight Density:
Weight of sample (g)
¸
454 (conversion to lb) D
Weight of water (g)
¸
454 (conversion to lb) E
Fresh weight density in
lb/ft3 = D x (E
¸
62.3)
2)
Dry Weight Density:
Dry matter (%)
¸
100 F
Dry weight density =
fresh weight density x F