Forages supply a significant portion of the energy and
protein used for milk production. However, they are not always the most
economical sources of energy and/or protein. Volatility of feed
ingredient prices and weather conditions during forage growth and
harvesting can dramatically affect the value of nutrients in forages
relative to other feed ingredients. Feeding strategies should reflect
the relative values of nutrients among feeds; when forages are
relatively expensive, diets should be formulated with minimum forage and
when forages are a bargain, diets should be formulated to maximize
forage use.
There are additional limits to the range in forage content of diets
that are independent of the relative prices of ingredients. Cows
consuming diets with inadequate forage content are more likely to have
ruminal acidosis, which might decrease fiber digestibility, microbial
protein production, and milk fat content, as well as increase incidence
of health problems, such as laminitis and displaced abomasums. This is
because forages are higher in fiber than most other feed ingredients and
fiber helps prevent ruminal acidosis.
Fiber generally ferments less rapidly than starch and sugars, so
high-fiber diets result in a less severe drop in ruminal pH after meals.
In addition, long-forage fiber stimulates chewing and secretion of
salivary buffers which neutralize fermentation acids in the rumen.
Increasing the forage content of the diet provides a more consistent
fermentation and increases stability of rumen pH. However, cows
consuming high-forage diets are more likely to have dry matter intake
limited by physical capacity of the rumen.
Fiber is more filling than other feed components because it is more
slowly fermented and has a longer retention time in the rumen.
High-forage diets are more likely to limit milk production, increase
loss or decrease gain of body condition, increase incidence of ketosis,
and decrease reproductive performance. When groups of cows are fed a
total mixed ration (TMR), feed intake of some cows in the group will be
limited by physical fill more than others. The most profitable feeding
strategy is one that considers both costs of feed ingredients and animal
performance.
Fiber digestibility of forages is variable and has a large effect on
animal performance. More digestible fiber is less filling because it is
retained in the rumen for a shorter period of time. Because it is less
filling, diets containing highly digestible fiber allow greater dry
matter intake for animals with intake limited by physical fill. The
objective of this article is to answer some common questions about fiber
digestibility of forages and strategies to maximize benefits of forages
with high fiber digestibility.
Q. How variable is fiber digestibility of
forages?
A.
Extremely variable! Ruminal neutral detergent fiber (NDF)
digestibility of forage ranges from less than 25% to more than 75%.
However, not all of this variation is from forages alone.
Characteristics of the animal and non-forage feed ingredients modify the
maximum NDF digestibility of forages. Individual animals have different
retention times in the rumen because of differences in rumen size, level
of feed intake, and chewing efficiency; and other dietary ingredients
affect ruminal pH, microbial populations,
and microbial activity. Neutral detergent fiber digestibility of
forages is best compared using in vitro rumen fermentation. In vitro
rumen fermentation is conducted by incubating forages that have been
dried and ground with ruminal microbes for a specific period of time
(~30 hours for dairy cows). In vitro fermentation eliminates many
factors that affect NDF digestibility in experiments with animals and
therefore allows a more fair comparison of feeds. In vitro NDF
digestibility varies from 25 to 60% for both alfalfa and corn silage
grown in different environments. Any way you look at it, NDF
digestibility is extremely variable.
Q.
When will NDF digestibility affect feed intake?
A.
When physical
fill of the rumen limits dry matter intake. This means that under some
circumstances, enhanced NDF digestibility increases dry matter intake
and in other situations it does not. It is unlikely that feed intake
among all cows in a group will increase to the same extent when a forage
with higher NDF digestibility is fed because all cows in the group will
not have feed intake limited by physical fill to the same extent. Some
cows might not have feed intake limited by fill at all. Generally, feed
intake of higher producing animals is limited by physical fill to a
greater extent than lower producing animals and feed intake of animals
consuming higher forage diets is limited by physical fill to a greater
extent than that of animals consuming high-grain diets. High producing
herds, herds that maximize forage feeding, and high-group cows will
benefit most from forages with high NDF digestibility.
Q. How much effect can NDF
digestibility have
on milk yield?
A.
A dramatic increase in milk
yield from forage with enhanced NDF digestibility was reported by
Nebraska researchers who compared normal sorghum silage and a brown
midrib (BMR) sorghum silage fed to mid-lactation dairy cows. The BMR
sorghum silage had higher NDF digestibility in vitro and slightly higher
NDF content than the normal sorghum silage. The silages were included in
total mixed rations at 65% of DM (35% concentrates). The cows consuming
the BMR sorghum silage with higher NDF digestibility consumed 24% more
(~11 lb per day) feed and produced 46% more (~18 lb per day) milk.
Although these were not high producing cows (average milk yield was 50
lb per day), physical fill probably limited feed intake because they
were fed high-forage (65%), high-NDF (>40%) diets.
We recently compared a low lignin corn hybrid containing the brown
midrib 3 (bm3) mutation to a normal hybrid using cows with high milk
yield. The
corn silages were included in total mixed rations formulated to
contain 56% forage with 80% of the forage as corn silage and 20% of the
forage as alfalfa silage. In vitro NDF digestibility averaged 49% for
the bm3 corn silage and 39% for the normal corn silage. When the cows
were offered the bm3 corn silage, they ate 4.4 lb more feed per day,
produced 5.5 lb more milk per day, and gained more body condition than
when they were offered the normal corn silage. Milk yield before the
experiment of the 32 cows in our study ranged from 65 to 120 lb per day.
Cows producing 120 lb of milk per day had an average improvement of over
15 lb per day from the bm3 corn silage, but those producing less than 75
lb of milk per day had little or no improvement in milk yield. This
implies that the highest producing cows were most limited by physical
fill and benefited most from the lower filling effects of the highly
digestible NDF in the bm3 corn silage. Furthermore, feed intake of the
lower producing cows was not limited by physical fill with this diet.
In another experiment, we compared bm3 corn silage to normal corn
silage in diets formulated to provide 29% or 38% NDF. The low fiber
diets averaged 42% forage and the high-fiber diets averaged 66% forage.
The bm3 corn silage increased feed intake and milk production at each
level of forage in the diet and, as expected, the higher NDF
digestibility corn silage was more beneficial when offered in the
high-forage diet (see Table 1).
Cows offered bm3 corn silage in a high NDF diet produced as much milk
as when they were offered the bm3 corn silage in a low NDF diet.
Although energy intake was higher when consuming the low NDF diet, a
substantial amount of energy was partitioned to body condition. However,
when cows were offered the normal corn silage in a high NDF diet, they
produced 4.6 lb less milk than when they were offered the same silage in
a low NDF diet. This observation has important practical implications.
When cows consuming TMRs are switched from a low forage diet to a higher
forage diet to prevent excessive body condition gain, forages with high
NDF digestibility might allow the cows to maintain milk yield. Because
of this, forages with high NDF digestibility might also benefit cows in
mid- to late-lactation when they are fed higher forage diets to prevent
excessive body condition gain.
We also evaluated the effect of enhanced NDF digestibility across a
wider range of forages using data reported in the literature and found
that enhanced NDF digestibility of forage increased dry matter intake
and milk yield. One unit increase of NDF digestibility was associated
with 0.37 lb increase in dry matter intake and 0.51 lb increase in milk
yield. This analysis demonstrates that enhanced NDF digestibility is an
important factor affecting feed intake and milk yield over a wide range
of conditions.
Summary
Fiber digestibility is extremely variable
among forages and is an important measure of forage quality. Forages
with high NDF digestibility have the potential to increase feed intake
and milk yield. Benefits of enhanced NDF digestibility on animal
performance are greater for high producing cows and when high-forage
diets are fed.
Reprinted with permission from Michigan Dairy Review, Vol. 5
No. 4, October 2000, Michigan State University.