Biuret is available exclusively through ADM Alliance Nutrition®
and is approved for use in dairy lactation diets. Biuret is
formed by the controlled decomposition of urea; condensing two
molecules of urea into a single molecule of biuret, which
retains three of the nitrogen atoms
(see Figure 1). Feed-grade biuret is a mixture containing
biuret and urea (maximum of 14%) with small amounts of triuret
and cyanuric acid. Typically, biuret contains a minimum of 35%
nitrogen with a crude protein value of 246% (see Table 1).
Table 1
Nutrient Composition of Biuret
|
|
Item |
% AF |
% DM |
|
DM, % |
99.0 |
- |
|
Protein, % |
246 |
248.5 |
|
RDP % CP |
100 |
100 |
|
SIP1, % CP |
100 |
100 |
|
NPN, % SIP |
100 |
100 |
|
NRC 2001 A protein, % CP |
100 |
100 |
|
1
For use in formulation, biuret is slowly soluble
|
Biuret is less soluble than urea. The combination of structural
and physical characteristics slows the rumen digestion of
biuret. The in vitro ammonia release for biuret was
similar to that of SBM; whereas, ammonia production from urea
was markedly more rapid
(see Figure 2; Bartle, et al.,1998). Similar results were
observed for blood serum ammonia, when biuret and urea were
compared with SBM in beef feedlot diets (Bartle, et al., 2000).
Research on biuret as a feed ingredient was performed in the
late 1950s through the 1970s, mostly in beef cattle diets, where
biuret has been used for many years. The slower degradation and
physical properties assist in forming a high-quality, self-fed
supplement. Biuret is at least 7.3 times less toxic than urea,
making it ideal when using higher levels of NPN and in self-fed
applications. A small amount of work involved biuret in dairy
feeds where biuret was substituted for true protein. This was
before the concepts of RDP and RUP were in practice, and at
lower production than is common today, but milk production was
unaffected by use of biuret (Fonnesbeck et al., 1975).
ADM Alliance Nutrition research has evaluated the use of biuret
in lactating diets
(see Figure 3). Approximately 0.5 and 1 lb/head/day of
soybean meal replaced about 0.1 and 0.2 lb/head/day of biuret.
Diets were equal in crude protein and predicted RUP. Feeding
biuret did not affect milk production or milk composition of the
higher production animals. Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was similar
for each treatment. In the lower producing cows, milk
production was unaffected by biuret use, but when receiving 0.2
lb/head/day biuret, MUN was elevated and fat content was
reduced. The connection between the high MUN and depressed fat
is unclear, but is sporadically reported in the literature in
studies focused on RDP feeding. With appropriate balancing of
RDP and RUP, biuret was an effective substitute for degradable
true protein in these lactation diets.
Recommendations:
Nutritional Models:
Biuret is unique as a slowly soluble source of NPN. Biuret has
a slightly greater ammonia release rate than SBM. Using biuret
in NRC 2001 CPM or CNCPS models presents descriptive
challenges. As a source of NPN, it fits biologically into the
definition of the “A fraction” as a source of ammonia. However,
the assumption is made that NPN is immediately available to the
rumen, which is incorrect for biuret. The “B fractions” of the
models characterize a true protein that supports rumen peptide
effects in the CPM and CNCPS models. The “B fractions” also
predict the dietary RUP and, thus, metabolizable protein
available to the animal. While ammonia release rates of biuret
are similar to SBM, the NPN conversion to urea and ammonia does
not fit the assumptions of true protein within the models.
At the present, biuret is best incorporated in models as an NPN
ingredient. In the case of NRC, this means inclusion into the
vitamin-mineral category to avoid affecting energy equations.
Within the CPM and CNCPS models, the nitrogen would be 100% SIP
and 100% NPN to avoid affecting bacterial efficiency via the
peptide equations.
Rumen Balance:
Because of the broad spectrum of forages and ingredients
available, recommendations for degradable protein (RDP) are
general guidelines. In general, RDP should be from 10.5% to 12%
of diet DM to maximize rumen bacterial yield. To meet the
demands beyond ruminal supply of MP, the remainder of the
protein delivered will be RUP (6-7% of DM). Below 10.2%, RDP
may limit rumen efficiency. Soluble protein will typically
range from 5.5 to 6.5% of DM. Protein fractions may also be
expressed as a percentage of total dietary CP, in which case,
RUP will range from 32-40% of CP and SIP from 20-30% of CP.
Practically, RUP balance will be most beneficial from 34-38% of
CP. Biuret should be included in the SIP fraction and the SIP
values can float towards the upper end of the range.
Historical recommendations for dietary NPN levels are 1% of diet
DM to avoid intake concerns.
Intake:
Biuret should be treated as a source of NPN relative to intake.
There is little data to support improved palatability of biuret
compared with urea. Levels of NPN should not exceed about 1% of
the diet to avoid intake concerns. In practice, this will be
affected by the balance of RDP in the diet and management.
Within concentrates, the recommendation is typically 1.5% NPN to
avoid palatability concerns.
Carbohydrates:
Biuret will be less sensitive to inclusion of rapidly fermented
carbohydrates than urea. Use of NPN is typically most effective
when balanced against rapidly fermenting carbohydrates to
capture the nitrogen in bacterial protein. Molasses and sugar
supplements and refined starches (bakery waste, ground
high-moisture corn, etc.) have typically been increased with
urea feeding. With a slower release, biuret will be effective
with ground corn and non-forage fiber sources as well.
With Urea:
Combinations of biuret and urea will likely be desired to
maximize NPN in diets to reduce protein cost when faced with
combinations of sugar, finely ground HMC, and the more rapidly
fermented, processed corn silages. In field practice, for diets
having more fermentable energy sources, a 50:50 ratio of urea
and biuret may be reasonable, with the amount of biuret rising
as the level of NPN is increased and SIP raised beyond 33% CP
(see Table 2).
Minerals:
The level of sulfur needs to be reviewed in rations with added
NPN. A dietary ratio of between 10:1 and 12:1 of
nitrogen:sulfur is commonly recommended (target 11:1), which
would equate to about 0.23-0.25% sulfur. With a longer time for
rumen availability, there is the potential to impact digestion
of non-forage fiber sources, such as soyhulls as well, so
supplemental cobalt should be considered to maximize the
efficiency of the cellulolytic bacteria.
|
Table 2 Maximum Levels of Added Urea and Biuret in
Lactation Diets |
|
Ration SIP, % CP |
lb/Cow/Day |
|
Before NPN Addition |
Urea |
Biuret |
|
> 38 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
36 to 38 |
0.00 |
0.05 to
0.15 |
|
33 to 36 |
0.05 |
0.10 to
0.20 |
|
30 to 33 |
0.10 |
0.10 to
0.25 |
|
27 to 30 |
0.15 |
0.15 to
0.25 |
|
< 27 |
0.20 |
0.15 to
0.25 |