Table 3.  Effect of non-protein nitrogen source and supplementation frequency on ruminants consuming low-quality forage

 

 

 

 

 

 

P-Valueb

 

Treatmenta

Con vs

Urea vs

D vs

 

 Item

CON

UD

U2D

BD

B2D

Supp

Biuret

2D

 

Lambs (39 kg)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  OM intake, g/kg BW

24.8

29.5

27.5

29.5

27.5

0.01

0.96

0.08

 

  Total tract digestibility OM, %

42.8

51.4

51.2

51.0

48.7

0.009

0.49

0.56

 

  N balance, g/kg BW

-0.012

0.042

0.013

0.041

0.041

0.02

0.36

0.34

 

  Digested N retainedc, %

-54.4

16.3

6.5

28.6

19.4

0.003

0.45

0.56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steers (491 kg)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  OM intake, g/kg BW

16.1

17.7

17.3

18.1

17.4

0.009

0.29

0.08

 

  Total Tract OM Dig., %

53.7

53.8

54.6

55.5

53.7

0.31

0.52

0.38

 

  Bacterial N Production, g/kg BW

0.213

0.208

0.229

0.271

0.251

0.04

0.002

0.92

 

  Bacterial Efficiencyd

24.1

20.8

24.2

26.2

26.9

0.84

0.05

0.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Initial body condition score

4.85

4.85

4.86

4.87

4.89

 

 

 

 

  BCS change

-0.55

0.20

0.21

0.18

0.02

<0.001

0.40

0.51

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a CON = control; UD = urea supplement every day; U2D = urea supplement every-other-day; BD = biuret supplement every day; B2D = biuret supplement every-other-day.

b Con vs Supp = control vs supplemented treatments; Urea vs Biuret = urea vs biuret treatments; D vs 2D = daily vs alternate day supplementation.

c Calculated as (Daily N retention, g/kg BW / Daily N digested, g/kg BW) ´ 100.

d Calculated as g bacterial nitrogen/kg of OM truly digested in the rumen.