|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Supplemental Fat in
the Gestation Diet of Replacement Heifers
by R. A. Bellows, Ph.D., USDA-ARS, Livestock and Range Research
Laboratory,
Miles City, Montana†
|
 |
Meeting nutrient requirements of the
replacement heifer and the pregnant or lactating female is of
critical importance in assuring peak reproductive performance.
These requirements include protein, energy, minerals, vitamins,
dry matter, and water. Research has indicated adequate fat may be
an additional nutrient that needs to be present in the diet.
Research has evaluated the effects of supplementing the gestation
diet of first-calf heifers with fat supplied from various oil
seeds. Two studies were conducted on pregnant first-calf heifers.
Study 1
In the first study, dams were fed diets containing 1.7% fat for
the control diet and 4.7% fat in the experimental diet, with both
diets being equal in protein and energy content. Fat content of
the experimental diet was increased by adding 3 lb of safflower
seeds containing approximately 37% oil. Seeds were run through a
roller mill with enough pressure to crack approximately 90% of the
hulls while not causing oil loss. This process increased
digestibility by over 44%. The diets were fed for an average of
the last 53 days before calving and supplemental feeding was
stopped at calving when the dam-calf pairs were placed on range
pastures. At 5 hours of age, the newborn calf was placed in a cold
room maintained at 32°F and remained there for 140 minutes. Rectal
temperatures and blood samples were taken every 10 or 20 minutes
throughout the cold exposure period. Results show that calves from
dams that received supplemental fat during gestation responded to
the cold stress better than did calves from dams that did not
receive the added fat (Figure
1 and
Figure 2). These calves had a greater increase in body
temperature and were able to maintain the increased temperature
throughout the cold exposure. In addition, these calves had
greater blood glucose concentrations. This is important as it
indicates the calves had more “fuel” available for producing heat
through shivering thermogenesis (heat production).
Study 2
The procedures for the second study were similar to Study 1 with
diets fed for an average of 55 days before calving and supplement
feeding was stopped at calving. Diets were equal in energy and
protein content and contained 2.2% and 5.1% fat for the control
and high-fat diet, respectively. Fat content of the experimental
diet was increased by adding 5 lb of safflower seeds. Calves were
placed in the cold room five hours after birth with temperature
and blood sampling procedures the same as in Study 1. Results are
summarized in
Figure 3 and
Figure 4 and show essentially the same calf response as
obtained in Study 1. The two studies indicate calf response to
cold temperatures immediately after calving was improved by
feeding the dam supplemental fat during gestation.
Pregnancy
Rate
Additional data were obtained in Studies 1 and 2. Results are
summarized in
Table 1. Calf birth weights, calving difficulty scores, and
calf vigor scores were not affected by feeding the high-fat diets.
However, pregnancy rates were greater in dams that received fat
supplementation during gestation. This increase in pregnancy rate
is of special interest since fat supplementation ceased at
calving. This suggests a carry over effect of supplemental fat fed
during gestation.
Heifers
Our work has continued on effects of feeding fat during gestation
on subsequent reproduction in heifers. These studies have included
safflower seeds, raw soybeans, and sunflower seeds as fat sources.
Oil seeds were run through a roller mill to crack the hulls, but
without oil loss. Diets were formulated to contain approximately
equal amounts of protein and energy and contained 2.0, 4.2, 3.3,
or 4.5% fat for the control, safflower, soybean, and sunflower
diets, respectively. Diets were group fed in dry lot for an
average of 65 days precalving with supplemental fat feeding ending
at calving. Estrus was synchronized with two injections of
prostaglandin and bred in a 35-37 day breeding period. Results are
summarized in
Table 2.
There did not appear to be differences among the three fat sources
so the comparisons discussed will be for the average of the diets
containing supplemental fat vs. the control diet. Feeding fat
resulted in a non-significant increase in calf birth weight and in
the incidence and severity of calving difficulty. But, the
interesting increase found was a 13 percentage point increase in
fall pregnancy rate and a 30 lb increase in calf weaning weight.
A study on effects of feeding fat to replacement heifers was also
conducted. The study involved 246 weaned, crossbred heifers sired
by Hereford, Limousin, or Piedmontese sires that were held in
feedlots and fed diets containing either 1.9% or 4.4% fat from 254
days of age until they reached puberty or until the breeding
season started. The feeding period averaged 162 days. Fat content
of the diet was increased by adding 1.5 lb safflower seeds to the
daily ration. At the beginning of the breeding season, heifers
were moved from the feedlots to irrigated pasture and supplemental
feeding was stopped. Heifers were bred in a 54 day AI breeding
season. Results are summarized in
Table 3. Diet effects on percent puberal at the beginning of
the breeding season tended to be affected, but diet effects on age
at puberty in heifers that reached puberty by the beginning of
breeding or on final pregnancy rate were not different.
Sire effects were important for all three endpoints with the
general pattern being that Limousin-sired were the oldest with
fewest puberal at the beginning of the breeding season,
Piedmontese the youngest and highest percentage puberal at begin
breeding, and Herefords were intermediate.
Some interesting effects of fat feeding on the different breeds
represented in the study were noted. Statistically, this is called
a diet x breed interaction and was significant. Feeding fat had
little effect on the percentage of heifers puberal in the
Hereford-sired group (74 vs. 76%), reduced the percentage in
Limousin-sired (70 vs. 61%), but increased the percentage in the
Piedmontese-sired group (76 vs. 98%) (Table
3). Numerous studies have indicated Piedmontese is a
double-muscled, low-fat breed. Does this interaction suggest the
dietary fat “requirement” for breeds of lower body fat content may
be different than those for breeds with greater body fat content?
If this is true, it has interesting implications as we consider
present selection pressure in the industry being for animals with
decreased body fat. We think the 162 day fat-feeding period may
have been too long for the Hereford and Limousin breeds. The
results may have been more favorable if the feeding period would
have been shorter.
Many studies have been conducted or are underway to determine
possible mechanisms acting in the effect of fat on reproductive
activity. Animal scientists in Florida have suggested that some of
the fatty acids in the diet may inhibit synthesis of prostaglandin
by the uterus resulting in extended life of the corpus luteum and
its production of progesterone, thus avoiding death of the early
embryo.
Summary
Results of research indicate supplemental dietary fat can affect
reproductive end points in cattle. Results of our work suggest a
positive response in pregnancy rate and calf weaning weights in
lactating heifers when supplemental fat was fed for the last 50-60
days of gestation. The mechanisms of action are not clear at this
time.
†Since authoring this article, Dr. Bellows has retired from the
USDA. This research was conducted under a cooperative agreement
between USDA-ARS and the Montana Agric. Exp. Sta. Mention of a
proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of
the product by USDA, Montana Agric Exp. Sta., or the authors and
does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products
that may be also suitable. USDA, Agricultural Research Service,
Northern Plains Area, is an equal opportunity/affirmative action
employer and all agency services are available without
discrimination.
|
|