Achieving supplement target intake is
essential to deliver the needed nutritional supplementation to
cattle and to control supplementation cost. ADM Alliance Nutrition
self-fed products are formulated to provide nutrients at levels
that optimize utilization of the base forage diet. Intakes below
product recommendations do not provide adequate nutrient
supplementation to the cow. Intakes above the target provide an
excess of nutrients and increases supplementation cost. Product
lines that include effective intake controllers enable producers
to achieve target intake levels through product selection. Since
the 1950s, Alliance Nutrition’s brand Mintrate Block line, with
varying degrees of block hardness, has been used to manage intake
in diverse situations.
As management practices, base forages, and cattle genetics change,
it is important to document that product lines such as Mintrate
Blocks continually meet industry needs. A study evaluating the
differences among varying hardness degrees of Mintrate blocks was
conducted at the ADM Alliance Nutrition Beef Research Center to
validate intake control ability of the Mintrate Block product
line. Mintrate Block target intake range is 0.6 to 1.2 lb/day for
a 1,200 lb cow. However, different intake levels may be targeted
depending upon individual situations and management goals.
Experiment Specifications
The study involved 10 pens of 10 fall calving pairs and two pens
of 10 replacement heifers. Cows were black baldies with mature
weight of approximately 1,200 lb. Intake of Red (medium
palatability, product No. 520), Brunette (hard palatability,
product No. 523), and Brunette XH (extra hard palatability,
product No. 531) Mintrate Blocks were determined. Blocks for the
experiment were taken from the Mintrate Block production location
and probed to confirm they met manufacturing hardness
specifications.
Empty tub containers were used as block feeders. Use of tubs for
block containers prevented loss of block pieces on the ground and
ensured accurate determination of intake. Cattle were kept in
dry lots and given free-choice access to round bales of grass hay
(8.9% crude protein and 45% TDN on a DM basis). Cattle were fed
blocks for a three-week acclimation period.
The experiment was designed (Latin square design) so that each pen
of cows received all three Mintrate Blocks. Each block type was
fed over a three-week period. Previous experience has shown that
with cattle acclimated to blocks, intake levels can be determined
in about three weeks. Calves were about four months old at the
start of the experiment and probably consumed some block. However,
all block intake was attributed to cows.
Experiment Results
Cows consumed Red blocks at 1.45 lb/day (Table 1), which is above
the target intake range. Brunette blocks were consumed at 1.13
lb/day, which is within the target intake range. Intake for the
Extra Hard blocks was 0.41 lb/day, which is below the target
intake range. Based on these values, label target intake for this
management and production situation would have been achieved with
the Brunette blocks or mix of Brunette and Extra Hard blocks
This experiment also demonstrates the variability in intake that
can occur with seemingly similar conditions. Cattle in this
experiment were of similar genetics, fed the same source of hay,
and were housed in similar pens. Even with all these efforts to
achieve low variation, individual pen intakes (averaged over all
three block hardness's) ranged from 0.77 to 1.28 lb/day
(Table 1).
This illustrates substantial intake variation can occur among
groups of similar cattle under similar conditions, and greater
differences when conditions are variable. Over consumption of
self-fed supplements during the first two to three weeks of
feeding is not unusual and occurred in this experiment. During the
acclimation period, block intake averaged 1.6 lb/day compared to
1.0 lb/day during the experiment.
Conclusion
Experiment results confirm intake differences among Red, Brunette,
and Extra Hard Mintrate Blocks and that these differences can be
used to achieve target intakes for cattle with differing intake
pressure on self-fed supplements. Brunette blocks were consumed at
about 80% of the Red block, and the Extra Hard block was consumed
at about 30% of the Red block consumption.
Table 2 provides guidelines for selection of block hardness
options based on forage quality. In the experiment referred to in
this article, a harder product was needed, in comparison to the
block corresponding to forage quality (Table 2), to achieve target
intake of nursing cows in dry lot. Alliance Nutrition Mintrate
Block hardness options provide a management tool for producers to
control block intake under various production and management
situations, and to achieve optimum supplementation level and costs
for their operation.
Table 1 Block Intakes (lb/day) by Pen and Individual Block
Treatments
|
Mintrate
Block |
|
Pen |
No. 520
Red (medium palatability) |
No. 523
Brunette (hard palatability) |
No. 531
Brunette XH (extra hard palatability) |
Average |
|
1 |
1.17 |
0.80 |
0.46 |
0.81 |
|
2 |
1.00 |
0.88 |
0.44 |
0.77 |
|
3 |
1.54 |
1.48 |
0.61 |
1.21 |
|
4 |
1.29 |
0.99 |
0.21 |
0.83 |
|
5 |
1.69 |
1.34 |
0.50 |
1.18 |
|
6 |
1.41 |
1.03 |
0.45 |
0.96 |
|
7 |
1.85 |
1.53 |
0.46 |
1.28 |
|
8 |
1.51 |
1.13 |
0.28 |
0.97 |
|
9 |
1.73 |
1.12 |
0.42 |
1.09 |
|
10 |
1.80 |
1.36 |
0.33 |
1.16 |
|
11 |
1.06 |
0.92 |
0.44 |
0.81 |
|
12 |
1.38 |
0.97 |
0.32 |
0.89 |
|
|
|
Average |
1.45 |
1.13 |
0.41 |
1.00 |
|
Low |
1.00 |
0.80 |
0.21 |
0.77 |
|
High |
1.85 |
1.53 |
0.61 |
1.28 |
|
|
|
Target |
0.6 – 1.2 |
0.6 – 1.2 |
0.6 – 1.2 |
|
Source: ADM Alliance Nutrition, Exp. 6089.
Table 2 Mintrate Block Recommendations Based on Forage Quality
|
|
No. 522
Blonde (most palatable) |
No. 520
Red (medium palatability) |
No. 523
Brunette (hard palatability) |
No. 531
Brunette XH (extra hard palatability) |
|
Forage quality |
Good |
Average |
Low |
Poor |
|
Crude protein |
>8% |
6 – 8% |
4 – 6% |
< 4% |
|
TDN |
>55% |
50 – 55% |
45 – 50% |
< 45% |