|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Early Weaning Calves
Offers Advantages
by Dan B.
Faulkner, Ph.D., University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois |
 |
Weaning calves earlier than the
traditional 205 days of age offers numerous advantages. Early
weaning can help producers manage forage and feed supplies when:
Forage supplies are low, such as during a drought.
Forage is of low-quality, such as pure fescue pastures in
mid-summer.
Winter feed supplies are limited.
Summer calving is initiated to reduce winter feed cost for the
cow.
Cow reproductive advantages can also
be obtained with early weaning:
It is easier to get thin cows and/or first or second calf heifers
bred.
Cows enter winter in good condition.
Early weaning also offers marketing
advantages:
A producer may market cull cows that have calved on a better
market than the fall market.
The production of high-quality beef (better quality grade) from
calves.
Illinois
Research
Research at the
University of Illinois evaluated the influence of calf management
systems on the economics of beef production systems. More
specifically, the effects of weaning time and creep feeding on cow
performance, calf performance, and carcass merit of calves at
slaughter have been evaluated. The following discussion summarizes
research results at the University of Illinois.
BROOD COW ADVANTAGES
Early Weaning and Brood Cow Reproduction
Cow reproduction
was improved by 12% when calves were weaned prior to the breeding
season. It is estimated that every open cow costs $125. This cost
is a combination of loss of value of the open cow and cost to
develop a heifer to replace her. Based on this value, the 12%
improvement in reproduction would result in savings of $15 for
each cow in the herd. The cows from which the calves were weaned
early gained 85 lb/hd more than the cows nursing calves. This
weight gain might be beneficial to reduce the need for
supplemental feed for brood cows.
Creep Feeding Heifers
and Milk Production
We have also
evaluated the influence of creep feeding heifers on subsequent
milk production. Previous research has suggested that creep
feeding heifers results in approximately a 25% reduction in milk
production when heifers become lactating cows. Much of this
research was conducted with British bred heifer calves. We
conducted a study with Simmental x Angus heifers and found a
similar 25% reduction in milk production. We would not recommend
creep feeding replacement heifer calves, but feel that creep
feeding steer calves may improve quality grade with no decrease in
feedlot performance.
CARCASS ADVANTAGES
Creep Feeding Affects on Carcass Quality and Feedlot Performance
An NCBA National
Beef Quality Audit clearly shows a need for more high-quality beef
(better quality grade) to meet consumer demand. The development of
new marketing grids that pay for cattle based on quality and yield
grade are a result of the lack of sufficient supplies of
high-quality cattle.
University of Illinois creep feeding
research has demonstrated that source of creep feed, amount of
creep feed consumed, and length of time calves consume creep feed
all have an influence on carcass quality grade. We have seen an
increase in quality grade as the amount of creep feed consumed
increased. The source of creep feed also has an influence on
quality grade.
When calves were placed on a finishing
diet after weaning, those creep fed with a corn-based diet had
higher quality grades than those fed a soyhull-based diet, even
though the daily gains of the calves were similar. This could be
due to differences in the volatile fatty acids produced from the
different diets. Calves consuming the corn-based diets had higher
propionate and lower acetate levels than the soyhull-fed calves or
the non-creep fed calves. Based on our published and unpublished
data, it appears that to increase carcass quality, calves must be
creep fed for about 80 days. In another study, creep feeding for
55 days prior to weaning had little benefit on carcass quality,
possibly because the creep feeding period was insufficient to
initiate marbling deposition.
Early Weaning Affects
on Carcass Merit
We have evaluated
the influence of early weaning on feedlot performance and carcass
merit. We have found that weaning at 150 days improves quality
grade and improves feed efficiency in the feedlot. We found a 30%
increase in calves that graded average choice or better due to
weaning at 150 days. We have also observed a slight increase in
the carcass weights of the early weaned calves compared to
non-creep fed calves. All calves were slaughtered at 0.4 in. of
backfat, so the increased carcass weight and quality grade
improvement were not due to the calves being fatter. Overall, the
number of calves with carcasses in this high-quality range (above
average choice) varied from 70% to 95% depending upon the breed
type. We observed 30% of the carcasses from Simmental x Angus
calves were lower in quality compared to Angus x Hereford calves,
but treatment differences were the same.
When comparing 90, 150, or 210 days of
age at weaning, we observed calves weaned at 90 days tended to
grade better. There was little response to 150 day weaning in this
study. These calves were slaughtered at less backfat (0.3 in.) and
were not fed as long. These two factors may account for some of
the differences observed. Overall, over 67% of the cattle were in
the premium beef grades (above average choice), even when calves
were slaughtered at less backfat.
Conclusion
Cow weight gain
and reproductive performance can be improved by weaning calves
prior to the breeding season. This will reduce replacement cost
and can lower supplemental feed costs.
The goal of producing high-quality
carcasses (better quality grade) from steers placed on feed as
calves is achievable. Management of calves to acclimate them to a
high-energy diet as early as possible is critical. In our studies,
this management had more influence than the calfs genetic merit
for marbling. However, the effects of high marbling EPDs have been
additive with our management program, so both are important.
Producers desiring to produce high-quality cattle for the
marketplace should consider the breeds they use in their
crossbreeding program, the marbling EPD in the bulls, and the
management of their calves to get them on a high-energy diet as
early as possible. This research supports that carcass fat can be
reduced and quality improved by using appropriate management
strategies.
References available upon request.
|
|