As cattle and feed prices continue to
soar, producers often find themselves spending countless hours
searching for ways to lower production costs. Supplemental
feed represents the largest single cost item in the majority of
operations and is, therefore, the area that receives the most
scrutiny. Over the last decade, alternative or by-product
feeds have increased in popularity due to availability and lower
cost per unit of energy and/or protein. However, producers
may not be fully aware of how to price and safely feed the vast
majority of products available.
Pricing is a rather in-depth subject and varies significantly from
one area of the country to another. For example, a producer
located within 10 miles of a brewery will be able to obtain a more
competitive price on brewers grains than someone 250 miles away
due to lower transportation cost. The scope of this article
will focus more on the feeding aspect of by-products.
Questions on pricing should be directed to the local extension
agency, state university, or ADM sales representative or
specialist.
By-product feeds can fit into beef feeding programs as the primary
roughage, as a supplement to a routine ration, or as a replacement
for part of the ration. Regardless of how the products are
positioned, the primary goal of supplementary feeding is to
provide needed energy, protein, and/or vitamins/minerals.
By-product feeds are derived from raw parent products that vary
greatly in chemical composition. Nutrient levels of the
resulting by-products will vary significantly based on weather,
management, crop maturity, and harvest and processing methods.
Sampling is of the utmost importance when utilizing alternative
feedstuffs and should occur prior to ration formulation and on
regular intervals thereafter. Primary nutrients of concern include
energy, protein, fat, and specific minerals and vitamins.
Energy
As discovered in numerous research trials over the last decade,
energy values of many feeds change as the amount in the diet
changes, especially when forage is replaced with concentrate.
Care must be taken when balancing rations to ensure optimum
utilization of energy.
Changes in energy value are referred to as associative effects and
can be labeled as positive or negative. High-starch
feedstuffs (i.e. corn grain, grain sorghum, wheat, rice bran, and
hominy) have negative associative effects on forage digestibility.
This negative effect is due primarily to lowered rumen pH from
rapidly degraded starch and a subsequent change in the microbial
population to an environment more conducive to starch
digestibility.
A feedyard is not concerned with negative effects on forage
digestibility since a limited amount of roughage is simply used as
a rumen buffer and stabilizer. Stocker operations, on the
other hand, should note this effect since production is primarily
derived from forages. If the goal is to maximize forage
intake and digestibility, energy supplementation should stay at or
below 0.5% of body weight.
Some alternative feedstuffs provide energy in the form of highly
digestible fiber rather than starch. Corn gluten feed,
brewers grains, distillers grains, soybean hulls, and wheat
middlings are examples of low-starch/high-fiber energy feeds.
Because the energy in these feeds is in the same form as in the
forage, there is less of a negative effect on total forage
digestibility.
Protein
To maximize intake and obtain optimum performance, the animal’s
daily crude protein requirement must be met. Protein can be
classified as either degradable intake protein (DIP) or
undegradable intake protein (UIP). In short, DIP is degraded
and utilized by rumen microbes. UIP, also called “bypass
protein,” flows through the rumen unaltered and is utilized in the
small intestine (similar to a human).
Forage intake and digestibility are significantly diminished when
DIP is limiting. Protein sources with high DIP values
include soybean hulls, soybean meal, rice bran, corn gluten feed,
wheat middlings, whole cottonseed, cottonseed meal, and urea.
When DIP is adequate, performance can be enhanced when young
growing animals are supplemented with UIP. Feeds high in UIP
include blood meal, feather meal, corn gluten meal, and distillers
grains. In the majority of situations, balancing to meet
crude protein requirements should be sufficient to meet production
goals.
Fat
Feeding fat or high fat feeds is one practical method of
increasing or sustaining energy intake and is common practice in
feedyard and dairy type rations. These operations, however,
typically monitor feedstuffs regularly and ensure added fat levels
remain below detrimental levels. Alternative feeds with
higher fat levels include whole cottonseed, distillers grains,
rice bran, whole soybeans, and hominy. When feeding these
products, total dietary fat should be kept below 5-6% (dry matter
basis) for optimum performance. Excessive fat levels can
cause digestive disturbances and diarrhea and can greatly reduce
feed intake.
Vitamins/Minerals
Beef and dairy cattle require adequate amounts of minerals and
vitamins each day to optimize production and performance. This,
however, can be a double-edged sword as toxicity problems can
arise when some are fed in excess.
Minerals
Minerals that should be closely monitored when feeding alternative
feeds include calcium (Ca), phosphorous (P), magnesium (Mg), and
sulfur (S). The vast majority of by-products are relatively
high in phosphorous. While excessive phosphorus is rarely a
nutritional problem, it can be an environmental concern.
Supplements with high calcium and limited or no phosphorus are
ideal when feeding moderate to high amounts of by-product feeds.
One should target a Ca:P ratio of at least 1:1 (optimal is 2:1).
When utilizing products with high fat content, dietary calcium and
magnesium levels should be increased. High dietary fat
increases fecal calcium losses through the formation of soaps.
In turn, high dietary calcium and phosphorus can negatively impact
magnesium absorption. Therefore, by increasing both calcium
and magnesium, one can eliminate potential mineral imbalances and
deficiencies resulting from high dietary fat.
Sulfur levels can be excessive in a number of products including
corn gluten feed, brewers grains, and distillers grains.
Mismanagement in mixing and or feeding can result in animal
morbidity and mortality if sulfur levels are excessively high.
Animal effects may be exacerbated if sulfur levels in drinking
water are elevated. The requirement for sulfur is 0.15% of
dietary dry matter and maximum recommended level is 0.3%.
Vitamins
Vitamin concentrations in the majority of by-products are very low
or non-existent. Rations including these feedstuffs need
adequate vitamin A, D, and E supplementation. In addition,
for those products containing high sulfur levels, thiamin has been
shown to reduce polioencephalomalacia symptoms and should be
included in a supplement package.
Specific Nutrient Levels and Feeding
Guidelines
Average nutrient levels for by-products are given in Table 1.
Recommended guidelines for feeding are also provided for both
forage and grain-based rations. As discussed previously,
by-products should be analyzed for nutrient content and rations
formulated accordingly before actually feeding the specific
by-product as nutrient levels can vary significantly.
|
Table 1 Average Nutrient Content of
By-products and Suggested Feeding Rates |
|
|
Dry Matter
(%) |
Crude Protein
(%) |
Fat
(%) |
Ca
(%) |
P
(%) |
K
(%) |
Mg
(%) |
S
(%) |
Max Level
in Ration (DMB**) |
|
Forage-Based |
Grain-Based |
|
Corn * |
90 |
9.80 |
4.10 |
0.03 |
0.32 |
0.44 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
<0.5% BW*** |
- |
|
Soybean Hulls |
90 |
12.00 |
2.10 |
0.53 |
0.18 |
1.29 |
0.22 |
0.11 |
<0.5% BW |
30% |
|
Rice Bran |
91 |
14.40 |
15.00 |
0.10 |
1.73 |
1.89 |
0.97 |
0.20 |
<0.4% BW |
33% |
|
Rice Millfeed |
91 |
6.80 |
6.40 |
0.08 |
0.60 |
2.20 |
0.57 |
0.30 |
<0.4% BW |
40% |
|
Corn Gluten Feed, dry |
90 |
21.50 |
3.90 |
0.07 |
0.95 |
1.40 |
0.40 |
0.47 |
<0.5% BW |
50% |
|
Corn Gluten Feed, wet |
43 |
21.50 |
3.90 |
0.07 |
1.00 |
1.40 |
0.40 |
0.47 |
<0.5% BW |
50% |
|
Wheat Middlings |
89 |
18.40 |
4.90 |
0.15 |
1.00 |
1.13 |
0.40 |
0.19 |
50% |
|
Whole Cottonseed |
89 |
24.40 |
17.50 |
0.17 |
0.62 |
1.24 |
0.38 |
0.27 |
0.3-0.5% BW |
15-20% |
|
Hominy |
90 |
11.50 |
7.70 |
0.50 |
0.57 |
0.65 |
0.26 |
0.10 |
<0.5% BW |
Max. 6% fat in diet |
|
Brewers Grain, wet |
21 |
26.00 |
6.50 |
0.29 |
0.70 |
0.58 |
0.27 |
0.34 |
15-20% |
|
Brewers Grain, dry |
90 |
29.20 |
10.80 |
0.29 |
0.70 |
0.58 |
0.27 |
0.40 |
15-20% |
|
Distillers Grain, dry |
94 |
23.00 |
9.80 |
0.11 |
0.43 |
0.18 |
0.07 |
0.40 |
15 - 30% |
|
Distillers Grain, wet |
50 |
30.00 |
16.00 |
0.03 |
1.02 |
1.30 |
0.42 |
0.40 |
20% |
30% |
|
Cottonseed Hulls |
90 |
4.20 |
1.70 |
0.15 |
0.09 |
0.88 |
0.14 |
0.08 |
- |
10-25% |
|
Cotton Gin Trash |
90 |
7.4 |
1.7 |
0.65 |
0.12 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25% |
|
*Corn
grain used as a reference point.
** DMB = dry matter basis
*** % BW = percent of body weight (dry matter basis) |
|
Supplementing By-products The
availability of grain by-products and cost-effectiveness of using
by-products in livestock rations has necessitated the need for
supplements specific to their use in livestock feeds. ADM Alliance
Nutrition offers balanced supplements formulated specifically to
complement a wide range of by-product commodities. Beef by-product
supplements contain elevated calcium, optimum trace mineral and
vitamin fortification, and added thiamin. ADM Alliance Nutrition
by-product balancer supplements can be fed free-choice or mixed in
the ration. These supplements are available with or without
protein fortification and can be obtained in meal or pellet form.
Contact your local ADM Alliance Nutrition professional for more
information regarding the by-product balancer that’s tailor-made
for your feeding program.
For More Information
Call TOLL FREE (1-866-666-7626)
Please
include the following information with your e-mail questions:
Name,
Address, City, State, Zip Code, and Telephone Phone Number.
E-mail
AN_BeefHelp@admworld.com